• The forum software have been upgraded to the latest version.

    If you notice anything that looks off, or does not work, please let us know.

    For more information, click here.

For those interested in AoS: New Sigmarine pictures

Well if I were playing a straight army those would be my new cold ones!
 
They looks cool, but way too static for my liking. The cavalry just seems to be waiting to be charged, and cavalry is supposed to be the ones charging. And the dragon, it it me or does it seem to just have one wing??
 
I think the cavalry are kinda stormcast varanguard, and the dragon archaon! I'm looking forward to these!
 
:sorry::sorry:
It looks like the Ægyptian exhibit at some big museum.
 
I'm guessing these guys are gonna be horrificly op and that the dragon does actually have two wings.
 
dracoth cavalry.. 2 dracoths per box.. so there goes your multiple pose thing... and they already looked static :(
dragon looks good, but the armour plates will need some good painting to break up the clumpy feeling, also the other wing looks more leaning backwards on the picture with the white wing membrame you can see a little bit
 
I think I the dragon had been made flying they would look a hell of a lot cooler, like on the 3rd picture. Maybe some heavy conversion work brings it up to those heights :p
 
Ya I don't understand why have the wings be in that odd angle...well it's the answer to archanon tho will more than likely be the same cost
 
Bracnos said:
man the more I look at the third photo I keep thinking how much better the model would be if it was done in that flying pose...:(
Click to expand...
I personally think that it is one of the worst dragons that GW has ever produced.
 
It's not just the wing, the neck looks too long for the breast plate position.
 
NIGHTBRINGER said:
I personally think that it is one of the worst dragons that GW has ever produced.
Click to expand...

If it comes with the option of no armour I think that make the wings look right.

The armour on the leg is making the wings look wrong.
 
NIGHTBRINGER said:
I personally think that it is one of the worst dragons that GW has ever produced.
Click to expand...
Ill have to agree with you on that one if I decide to use this ill have to agree with you on that one, so far the only "Dragon" I like from GW is Archanons but that's more of a hydra. (not that any of the dragons from gw are much to look at anyway just my two skinks)
 
Crowsfoot said:
If it comes with the option of no armour I think that make the wings look right.

The armour on the leg is making the wings look wrong.
Click to expand...
The armour looks extremely bad, but even without it I think those wings will continue to look ill shaped/positioned.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top