Version: Beta Draft 2 Last updated 12-08-2015 So I have tried to put together something I think make sense. If it does or does not will be up to you, but here it is: The Official Phat Comp (yes, I know it is narcissistic) Inside you will find - Army building restrictions (including unit sizes) - A new Win condition (fit for Tournament play) - A fix for the Summon issue - Added strategic options. - System for "Ranked unit" benefits (optional) - Allies system (Optional) To come: - Bug and loophole corrections. I hope it is usable! If not, all is subject to change (back of Tzeentch, I got this one) All feedback is accepted, but will only be taken serious and addressed if it has a well-written argument attached to it
This seems like an interesting approach Phat. I'll have to look a bit more into the rules you have created, but I al ready like what I've read so far; the means of chosen warscroll as you have suggested seems like a good middle ground to start with. And defiantly is more welcome. than the "choose everything you brought" approach GW has come up with.
I already found a lot of holes in it, but I am curious to see what people make of the first first version before I spill the beans
Warscrolls I dislike the notion of counting warscrolls, limiting warscrolls, assigning maximum warscrolls . . . as if "duplicate warscrolls" is even a thing. To me a warscroll is the merely new (and perhaps silly) name for "entry in the armybook". A stack of warscrolls printed out, bound together on the left edge, with a decent cover is (or would be) an AOS Armybook. I think Warscrolls should not be a unit of measure for a composition system. ________________________________________________________ Standard bearers? The only place I see it used is as something that scores a point for the OpFor. Am I missing something? Since wound allocation is totally up to the side being wounded a standard bearer would simply be the absolute last model to die, always. I like having them on the table but it would be nice if standards did something useful. _________________________________________________________ Ranking: How does this work if forming up in lances, vees, triangles, or wedges?
Trying to remember what the plant the standard rule does... Well it looks like the rules are on each unit for that. [Scar-vet BSB] "Proud Defiance: While the standard is planted, you can re-roll any failed hit rolls for this model and any Seraphon units from your army within 10". " For Saurus warriors, it seems like this is supposed to be the standard bearer rule ? stardrake icon Models in this unit may carry stardrake icons that pulse with the terrifying essence of a celestial predator. If a battleshock test is made for an enemy unit within 5" of any stardrake icons, add 1 to the result.
Agreed it is not the preferred way, but we need something and Warscrolls seems to be the currency GW has planned. I tried to work with that and before I have some feedback on how it works its how its gonna be. Regarding standard bearers: All standards have an ability. As N810 deducts: my idea of a standard is both that of the Scar Vet and that of the unit. I will add a better explanation so it becomes clear. Correct That way you get a point for killing a unit with a Standard like you did in 8th.
Icons is plural. Saurus can haz multiple icons (standard bearers) ?? Yep, we do need something. Where has GW published anything about Warscroll limits? That goes against bring/buy one (or more) of every kind of model. (The Buy More Stuff! business model.)
Makes sense. I guess. Does it say anyplace there can be only one stick? (On Empire warscrolls..?) Maybe the effect does not stack. So it would not matter if a unit had an entire color guard.
lol, yea I would assume it doesn't stack, otherwise you could have every model carrying a banner, for like +10 to battleshock rolls.
But, I could give a Saurus unit a four stick 'colorguard' ? and by spreading them out I could have a rather big zone within 5 inches of a banner? Also, with PhM's comp idea would I potentially give up 4 banner points or does that fail to stack as well?
Army - Comp All units with the option must have a standard bearer. Only one command group per unit. I am currently trying to deal with the "Measure from model" problem, and will have a quick and tempoary fix in the next version.
Have anyone tried it? I cant move on until I have response from someone other than myself! If there is no requirement for me finishing it, I wont So until someone throws something back, consider this in hibernation.
They arent much into AoS, and is waiting for something to happen to it. Besides, I need input from peers I cant affect or explain the meaning to, else I dont know if it works
Looks pretty good. I might put a cap on heroes, instead of a minimum. Joke rules, maybe instead of automatic, make them work like a prayer for a priest and on a 4+ it goes off. Summoning maybe for each warscroll that you want to summon later in the game you must add +1 to scroll selection. For example if I want to take chakax, but have the option to summon him back, he costs two warscrolls instead of one. Or I know I will want more Temple guard later. unit of 5 costs 1 if I want to bring in more later on now costs 2 scrolls. That will cap the summoning, but won't take it out completely, just have to choose wisely what you want to add or bring back