Tutorial Writers' Wretreat or Crytics' Crypt? (love needed)

Abandon hope.

This here thread is a "Safe Place" to discuss all manner of things literary and fluffy. A place of ideas and thoughts where everyone is equally ignorant.

By the medium of random groupthink / cluster-mahrlect we shall all learn something. Or other.

I shall paraphrase this quote from Razordon Happiness.

As an author, Bob draws excellent stick figures.

Or as the Pope said to Michaelangelo, 'Look, I'm the bloody Pope! I may not know much about art, but I know what I like!"

I plan to put in some of my thoughts about how humour works, ways of structuring a short story and things like that. I invite you'all to do the same so that we can be a beacon of ignorance to cling to as we are swamped by the waves of general lack of talent.

Wait - don't beacons get very hot?

 

Discussion prompt: So about those Skaven. Can self interest look a tiny bit like loyalty? Or altruism? Is altruism by "noble" races in any way distinguishable from the rat version?

 

Alright, from the stand point of the local Skaven expert:

Loyalty between Skaven will occur between a very small group. This group will, of course, be willing to throw anyone under the bus in the name of personal advancement, but for the most part each member knows the other can be trusted.

In an official sense, such as an alliance between clans, it is known as a Treaty-Pact.

Basically, its keeping those you trust most close to you, while still backstabbing and distrusting everyone. Sort of like the best if the worst.

You can create friendships, loyalties, but keep them small and isolated.

And remember: At the end of the day, if its you or him, make sure its you.

 

Wait! What? You seem to know an awful lot about them for a skink.

I suppose an average skaven gains nothing from randomly killing. If they kill the highest warlord, it only creates an opportunity accessible to the NEXT highest warlord.

Their creative vacancy development program needs to be close to their station. They can gain a tiny bit more food / status / rank only if they chip away at those only slightly better off. They would also need to chip a little downwards to keep their own replacements at bay. The treaty-pact can only last until one individual floats to the top.

For this reason, your own twin brother would be the greatest threat. Keep this in mind, Scolenex.

Interactions between vastly different social strata would be a little more predictable, as long as you count a warlord lopping your head off just to see if his blade is still sharp as predictable. That warlord could actually command some respect and even self interested loyalty from those way below or who had entirely different motivations (foot soldiers who gain from the clan rising in power, Scalenex's girl rats, Esurc's assassin) His closest lieutenants would be the ones to watch.

Beyond those basic parameters, you can add actual personality traits untempered by a shred of conscience. Rat A may genuinely dislike rat B. Rat C might just be a stamp collector and homicidal maniac.

All bets are off as soon as someone acquires some sort of portable wealth. Even a slave will stick you if they think you are harbouring cheese, Slanputin.

 

I think you guys have it. Loyalty only lasts as long as the circumstances are in the best interest of the rat. I think there are a number of other factors to keep in mind outside of simply wanting something someone else has and actively seeking that individual's demise. Skaven, as much as it pains me to say it, all not all stupid creatures. I think, more than a desire to rise above their station, is self preservation. Hence why a hierachy can sustain itself and not fall apart at the seems.
Sure rat A might have cheese that rat B wants, but rat A has a big ally that he shares his cheese with (knowing that his cheese is valued and keeping self preservation in mind). Rat B might then coerce rat C and D into helping him get the cheese for a share, but if he cannot (as rat A's friend wears a necklace of rat ears that he has accumulated over his time with rat A), self preservation will likely keep him in check.

 

I have no cheese here. Nope. No idea what you're talking about.

Annoyingly, I'm mostly in agreement with what's been stated above. I think it's important to note that the sole reason to any Skaven being ostensibly nice to others is to manipulate them. For example, a Skaven warlord may keep his serviles well-fed to ensure their loyalty and keep their strength for his works. The serviles would keep with the warlord because they provide an easy source of nutrition. However, that's not to say the warlord won't bash them about to further cement his authority, or that his serviles won't mutiny once a better offer comes along/the cheese runs out.

 

But as we have seen, the cheese will never ever run out.

 

Well, if this is the spot to discuss random fluff...

One of my personal thought is that in Skaven chess the aim of the game is to cheat without the other player realizing. Watching over every match is an eagle eyed rat-man, who is there to watch for cheats and award points fittingly.

Every time one player cheats without the other realizing it, they gain a point. If the other player calls their cheat, they lose a point.

Also, for the record, this thread is awesome.

 

Thanks Reptile.

What happened to your beautiful signature bar?



You need to get that back in action!

 

I'm glad you share in my optimism.

This is a nice metaphor for wider Skaven society. Well done you. I might add that they are far more careless with their Pawns, that their Knights and Bishops are waiting for the opportunity to usurp, and the Queen is relegated to mating responsibilities.

 

That was a nice conversation - worthy of its own thread in the fluff forum.

But that was just a warm up - here is a real discussion prompt.

Where are the subjective boundaries in Fan Fiction? How much can you bend stereotypes to fit your superior plot? Or character arcs? (Ron Weasely must die!) Or what about Canon? Why do friendly skaven get @ravenss goat? Why does he have a goat? Is it a Tzeentch thing? Is Fanfic better than official GW stuff?

What makes some Fanfics readable and others "jarring"?

The SoB approach to putting detail into big pieces of WHFB fluff is summed up by these:
"I do some research (Lexicanum and Warhammerfb are really useful, there are loads of maps to be googled). I change major details when the Canon gets in the way of the story. (dates, locations, names, racial stereotypes, magic mechanics, even good/evil/bit of both alignment when needed)"

"I like to write into the giant gaps in the canon. The canon gives a solid and accessible context and inspiration, the gaps give almost total freedom to move. There is a good reason that I am writing into about 200 years before Karl Franz. There is too much defined detail in the present (and even worse, the end times to give me room to move."

 

There must be a REALLY thoughtful reply being brewed up somewhere....

I'll put up another discussion prompt soon.

 

I read this a while ago and forgot about it until now. Whoops! I think the only boundaries for Fan Fiction are those that keep the story believable. However this really should be applied to all writing, not just Fanfic. Stereotypes can be broken, but they need a very clear/clean explanation as to why they are broken. If you made a Saurus character that refused to eat unless it was set at a table and he was given a fork, spoon, and a knife, I would expect a pretty damn good explanation. Something so out of character really requires some background. Is the lost soul of a deceased human wizard possessing the saurus body? I don't know. Provide me the brain food to understand! Give me something, because that's very unsaurus behavior.

 

Sounds like Halfling mischief to me!

Thanks LKC, that was such a clear thought that I'm sure all conversation will be killed off.

Please accept this non-redeemable Friend-hammer voucher.

 

Hmm. I might try that myself.

The thing that I most want to alter from GW canon is the nobility of noble races. I know that nice elves are arrogant, but GW likes them to be right, or at least motivated by laudible ideals. Yawn.

My character's enemies are more likely to be human or elven than daemonic. Daemons are too easy (plot wise) "It's got horns, it's bad, kill it."

Much preferred is "It's got pointy ears, it's attractive and it wants to help. Expect to be betrayed." The enemy within the camp offers so much more to a story.

 

A new discussion point, one that comes to mind every time I write: the usage of the exclamation point in writing.

F.Scott Fitzgerald said “Cut out all these exclamation points. An exclamation point is like laughing at your own joke.” I can't help but agree to an extent - when reading amateur writing, although it is something that pervades even professional authors, it's something often used liberally and I find has the effect of cheapening the work.

My first issue is about it's effect on the reader. As I read I build my own mental image and voice. The usage of an exclamation point is an imposition on the author's behalf, thrusting the emphasis of their work upon the reader's internalised interpretation. When I come across an exclamation point in writing I find that, rather than being through down the author's work by his skill in writing I'm being patronised, suddenly being told "you must take this remark as a something shocking/ostentatious/interesting etc. It undermines the reading experience and force the point, rather than developing it through literary skill.

Secondly, focusing more on it's utility, it's the primary method for hyperbole in punctuation. It's the tool of spam, juvenile writing, and poor journalism in trying to grab a reader's attention. It's abuse lessens the work by becoming so obtrusive any meaning that could be conveyed by it's usage is lost. Now, I'm not suggesting it should not be used at all and abandoned to history, more that is something that should be used sparingly. Considering writing technique, if an exclamation point only appears in a novel twice then it creates a greater impact: the reader doesn't associate the exclamation point with the literary style of the author, and therefore it can help convey the significance a particular point.

 

Next discussion prompt is "Blessings and Curses".

@little-myth inadvertently brought this to my mind with:

We are fluffing into a world of many gods, and have discussed (inconclusively?)
the Relationship between Old Ones, Chaos, and the other deities in this very subforum.

The evidence of WHFB canon clearly shows that the gods do intervene through the medium of blessings and curses. (Mordheim. Lovely city. Very active nightlife. You should visit before it becomes a crater.)

Getting down to the level of individuals, let's say that we look at a goblin Shaman, Spellchekka the Illiterate. He has enjoyed the blessings of Mork or possibly Gork (magical prowess, a ward save) and the curses of Mork or possibly Gork (a nasty fungal infection between his toes, unpleasant looks).

He is standing over a dying Imperial Warrior Priest who coughs weakly and pronounces, "Sigmar curse you...urgh..."

What would be the consequence?

The entirely subjective (and therefore valid) Bob point of view is that if a comet didn't smite Spellchekka during that actual battle, he would blithely go his way and Sigmar could go and do whatever demigods do to themselves to himself and the shaman's life would go on as usual.

I think that this is because Sigmar has no authority over the sworn follower of another god or gods. He could intervene in a messy and possibly amusing way (through a force of nature, like a comet or a Sigmarite devotee, like a flagellant) but he would have no ongoing hold over the goblin's destiny. That is not to say that EVERY subsequent comet or flagellant wouldn't be seeking Spellchekka out, but rather to say that, beyond the scope of Sigmar's agents, the shaman would have nothing better to do than scratch his toes and sigh at his reflection.

So I ask you, cold blooded fellows (and fellasses),

• Does your god have any hold over me?
• The Old Ones are either dead, aloof or not coming back anytime soon. How can they bless? (a supernatural buff)
• Do the Old Ones care enough to curse (punish) their own? Or their perceived enemies?
• Are "blessings" from chaos just the flip side of a curse?
• If we concede that Tzeentch is a special case (layers upon layers of perception and deception, just like "This is starting to feel like inception... there is always a deeper level." @NIGHTBRINGER ) how would his "blessings / curses" feel different?

Let discussion be had.