Scar-Veteran
Just A Skink
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 2,052
- Likes Received
- 4,082
- Trophy Points
- 113
• I think LoK is good, not great. 6/10 or 7/10 feels about right.A good question. I definitely think it is a huge step down as compared to ATLA. It's not a bad show, but ATLA is close to perfection. If ATLA is a 10 on a scale of 0-10, then The Legend of Korra is a 6 at best.
Some of the things I disliked about the Legend of Korra:
- the characters are far less likable, especially the central characters. I don't really root for any of them. The only notable exception is Varrick, who is pure gold.
- the story is far more disjointed. ATLA built better from season to season
- most of the humor didn't really hit home for me (Varrick being the exception once again)
- Korra, despite starting the show with 3 elements already mastered, comes off as incompetent. I can't count the number of times she entered the Avatar state only to get absolutely bodied by an opponent she should have defeated. When Aang entered the avatar state it was awe-inspiring, but when Korra did so she didn't seem all that powerful... just the plain old Korra with glowy eyes. Additionally (and in line with point one), she isn't a particularly likable protagonist.
- they took one of the few elements that I disliked in ATLA, namely bloodbending, and dialed it up to an eleven. It wasn't good in ATLA (though it was thankfully limited to a single episode), and it is worse in Korra. Additionally, I did not like the addition of the lava bending ability granted to the earth benders. I could see them manipulating lava that was already there, but not creating it. Lava feels like the amalgamation of earth and fire bending, so giving it to earth benders seemed arbitrary.
- the "spirit world" story lines feel over done and boring
- I enjoyed the setting/world of ATLA far more
Some of the things I liked about the Legend of Korra:
- Varrick was awesome and is interplay with Zhu Li was always fun
- Ming-Hua (the armless water bender) was a badass character. Additionally, I like the concept of their whole team (aside from the Lava bending)
- the animation, just like in ATLA, was solid
- there were some fun nods to classic characters, with Iroh and Toph especially standing out. (this could also be considered a weakness, as my favourite parts of the show revolved around old ATLA characters).
Ultimately, I had some fun watching the show, but it is far cry from the original. ATLA is my favorite show of all time, while Korra wouldn't even crack my top 50. I recommend ATLA to everyone who hasn't seen it, but I never do so for Korra. It's not bad, but it is far from great.
What about you? How did you feel about the show? How would you compare it to ATLA? Pros & cons? (same questions for @Scalenex )
• I think the animation was excellent and potentially better than ATLA at times.
• I also don't find Korra as charming as Aang, but she's alright. The show is a bit more angsty teens/twenties.
• I agree that the stories feel less connected. I guess it was more of her adventures/trials as Avatar and less about her learning her abilities. However, that is one of the clever aspects I really like about the seasons of ATLA.
• I was VERY disappointed that LoK basically breaks the Avatar cycle.
I mainly ask because the premise of the post made me think of the Red Lotus who go after Korra. I know you're not a fan of lavabending (me either, really), but Zaheer, P'Li, Ming-Hua, and Ghazan are a great "rogue's gallery" for Korra. I think that's arguably the strongest season of LoK. Although, I do like to look of the masked Amon ffrom season 1. Amon and his cult initially came across suitably creepy and dangerous.
