8th Ed. Tail special rule?

Discussion in 'Lizardmen Tactics' started by Malebranche, Jul 23, 2013.

  1. Malebranche
    Saurus

    Malebranche Member

    Messages:
    96
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    8
    Ok I'm fairly new to lizardmen (loved them for years but only just started playing fantasy) so I have probably just missed something really obvious. Looking at various forums and trying to find more rumors, I have noticed a few people on various forums talking about Saurus possibly losing their "Tails" special rule. I didn't even know this rule existed. Where is it? I can't find it in the army book, and I can't find it mentioned outside a few different forums, but the date on the threads were all from 2013. Have I missed a special rule or something? Is it a special rule from last edition some people are still using? I am very confused
     
  2. n810
    Slann

    n810 First Spawning

    Messages:
    8,103
    Likes Received:
    6,522
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I have been playing for 3 editions and I never heard of that rule..?
     
  3. Malebranche
    Saurus

    Malebranche Member

    Messages:
    96
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    8
    Might be a house rule or something I guess, I could only find a few posts with it mentioned, sounded like it gave an extra attack or something. Just figured I'd check here to make sure my Saurus went missing out. Thanks.
     
  4. Qupakoco
    Skink Chief

    Qupakoco Keeper of the Dice Staff Member

    Messages:
    1,871
    Likes Received:
    1,166
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I don't have my books on me right now, but Saurus used to have a rule called Primal Fighter or something similar. This meant one attack was considered a bite attack at the normal strength of the Saurus, regardless what weapon they use. I believe that this was a way to justify their extra attack. So with spears it meant the second rank only got one attack and characters had to make one at their regular strength, regardless of what weapon was used. I think they all but phased it out in 6th edition, but it was relevant in 5th. 7th has no such rule and 8th makes it irrelevant with the supporting attacks rules.

    So yeah. Maybe that?

    EDIT: The rule was called Predatory Fighter. Looks like it's making a comeback in the new book, but with different rules.
     
  5. Malebranche
    Saurus

    Malebranche Member

    Messages:
    96
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    8
    That could be it. They did mention it like the tail was used but that could just be misinterpretation. I know some people do like to use old army books.
     
  6. Clarkarias
    Skink

    Clarkarias Member

    Messages:
    42
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    8
    Saudis had a bite attack but there was never anything about a tail attack.

    The only tail attack I can come up with (prior to Monsterous Arcana) is the Wyvern.
     
  7. Stonecutter
    Terradon

    Stonecutter Member

    Messages:
    507
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    18
    IIRC, the rule for saurus was the "predatory fighting" rule with the fluff indicating saurus were particularly savage when in direct combat. Essentially, it nerfed spear saurus since it meant that only saurus in the front rank got the 2 attacks on the profile while the second rank only got 1 attack (this was prior to supporting attacks so spears were the only way to get anyone other than the front rank fighting at the time).
     
  8. Clarkarias
    Skink

    Clarkarias Member

    Messages:
    42
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    8
    Let me know if you have your 5th Ed copy of the Army Book handy Stonecutter. I can't find mine. I though it was a bite back in 5th.
     
  9. Stonecutter
    Terradon

    Stonecutter Member

    Messages:
    507
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    18
    I only started playing toward the end of 6th ed so 5th ed is out of my league :) However, I'll check our local store as they have a veritable treasure trove of old books in the back.
     
  10. Qupakoco
    Skink Chief

    Qupakoco Keeper of the Dice Staff Member

    Messages:
    1,871
    Likes Received:
    1,166
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I would assume the Tail Attack was an interpretation of the Bite Attack. 5th had it, 6th kind of had it, 7th didn't have it, and now 8th is apparently making it better. (according to hearsay)

    From the 5th edition rule book:
    From the 6th edition rule book:
     
  11. Clarkarias
    Skink

    Clarkarias Member

    Messages:
    42
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    8
    That's what I was looking for. Thanks Qupakoco.
     
  12. spawning of Bob
    Skar-Veteran

    spawning of Bob Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,911
    Likes Received:
    5,629
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No no, Clarkarias, you've got it wrong!

    Saudis have no bite attack and have a tea-towel attack

    SoB
     

Share This Page