• The forum software have been upgraded to the latest version.

    If you notice anything that looks off, or does not work, please let us know.

    For more information, click here.

AoS Second Edition

Lord-Marcus said:
View attachment 44103 View attachment 44104 View attachment 44105 View attachment 44106 View attachment 44107
Click to expand...

The only thing I’m interested in here is the Hippogryph (not the Stormcast on it mind) and mainly because it would make a great plastic Hippogryph for Bretonnians. Perhaps @Warden could replace the Stormcast with a spare Bretonnian knight to make an updated Bretonnian Duke on Hippogryph model?

In fact you could use those Vanguard Palladors as the basis of Bretonnian Hippogryph Knights to give them some Monstrous Cavalry! :joyful:

Another of my Warhammer conversion ideas that will probably never come to pass...

NIGHTBRINGER said:
View attachment 44115
Click to expand...

Why am I not surprised that this would happen? :rolleyes:

Look at the trouble you’ve caused @Lord-Marcus! :p
 
NIGHTBRINGER said:
I must apologize, all that SCE stuff turned my stomach a bit. I have recomposed myself (for now). :D
Click to expand...

Not all SCE are bad. For example, the Lord Ordinator (the one with the beard in malign portents) would be a good conversion for a hero of the Empire. :p
 
Killer Angel said:
Not all SCE are bad. For example, the Lord Ordinator (the one with the beard in malign portents) would be a good conversion for a hero of the Empire. :p
Click to expand...
ALL SCE are bad. If I were the emperor of the world I would have them all outlawed and melted down. Owning one would be a capital offence. :D
 
NIGHTBRINGER said:
ALL SCE are bad. If I were the emperor of the world I would have them all outlawed and melted down. Owning one would be a capital offence. :D
Click to expand...
So I have bad news for you. They are single army-ly providing the funds for my upgrade to my gaming computer
 
And, more importantly, the Dispossessed faction focus is out!

https://www.warhammer-community.com...faction-focus-dispossessedgw-homepage-post-3/

I’m really hoping that Dispossessed will get a tome in the new edition as well as being given all their artillery back - it’s one of the very few things that would change my mind from going full-on Fyreslayers as I would be able to spend much less money as I could use my existing Dwarf army (although I probably would still buy a Fyreslayers start collecting box to have a Magmadroth ally).
 
Last edited:
So... it seems dispossessed will have just points reduction and ironbreakers as battleline. Wow.
 
Lord Agragax of Lunaxoatl said:
Irondrakes not Ironbreakers.

Also they have Runesmiths with 30” unbind which is great for any Dwarf army in AoS.
Click to expand...

Nope, it's ironbreakers.
30" unbind is not a dawi-related thing. Unbind will be 30" for all armies, so it's NOT a new buff for dispossessed, but a general rule; it may be more useful for dispossessed than for other armies, but it's still a general change.
The only specific cookie given to dispossessed is (it seems) a change of role for a single unit.
 
Killer Angel said:
Nope, it's ironbreakers.
30" unbind is not a dawi-related thing. Unbind will be 30" for all armies, so it's NOT a new buff for dispossessed, but a general rule; it may be more useful for dispossessed than for other armies, but it's still a general change.
The only specific cookie given to dispossessed is (it seems) a change of role for a single unit.
Click to expand...

I’ve just checked and you’re right it is Ironbreakers. My bad.
 
ravagekitteh said:
You know, in the transformers fandom we have a term for people like you:
https://tfwiki.net/wiki/True_fan
Click to expand...

Wow, that’s a burn if I ever saw one. ;) How does @NIGHTBRINGER respond to this challenge to his authority?

And double wow, the Transformers Wiki is so much more informal than others like Wookieepedia, it’s close to being 1d4chan-esque in terms of informality, except without the swearing.
 
Still +2 on dispell at 30" is nice. Im wondering hoe efficient magic will be with these changes
 
Ecozh said:
Still +2 on dispell at 30" is nice. Im wondering hoe efficient magic will be with these changes
Click to expand...
to be honest this is starting to worry me. at 30" you cover most of the board. And since most wizards only cast 1 spell it's very easy to end up in a situation where each cast is faced with an unbind-attempt, which seems harsh especially as dedicated unbinders like the runesmith get bonusses. Or just imagine trying to field a wizard against nagash, it'd basicly be pointless if he gets a 30" range.
 
...especially considering that most wizards don't do nothing except casting that single spell. ..
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top