The Seraphon were cut from the core book of the AoS RPG.
While great, it is also a bit of a concern for those who have only recently invested in current Seraphon miniatures.
despite this they feature very prominently on book covers and artGW really seems to hate Seraphon. They were mentioned about three times in the core book,(including their section about their army. In the actual lore they were completely glossed over: “oh these guys exist, now let’s go back to talking about boring humans.) and haven’t gotten a SINGLE update to stats, models etc. besides the GHB. Despite being one of the first AoS armies, many armies released after them have gotten updates. They are AWESOME and play a very significant role in the lore, and I can’t fathom why they would ignore them so much!
I converted warriors to guards in the SC box using spare bits
Offtopic sorry.
I dont want to seem dim, but what are temple guard? I dont see a warscroll for them
We also feature in nearly every book with lore. However, by "feature" I mean nearly every single lore book has a sentence or two going like "and there where seraphon over there who did something and thus saved the world from certain doom".despite this they feature very prominently on book covers and art
Really astonishing results!GW Community guy paints seraphon army for contrast example.
https://www.warhammer-community.com...seraphongw-homepage-post-3fw-homepage-post-2/
Where did you hear that? I've been to several of Cubicle 7's seminars and havent heard anything of that.... I know there not in the WHFB roleplay but they should be with the rest of the order factions in the AOS rpg.
GW Community guy paints seraphon army for contrast example.
https://www.warhammer-community.com...seraphongw-homepage-post-3fw-homepage-post-2/
AWESOME! I can’t wait for these!
Miniwargamming did a carnasour in contrast paints. Looks great, but shows how the colors can bleed and blend. However that can be mitigated by being more careful or going over with the base color used to prime and then using the contrast paint again in that area.
that's been confirmed to be EXACTLY THE SAME text on the Harlequins model in 40K... its even in the same order.Further solidifies my opinion in spikey bits.
2nd rummour mill picture is clearly a chest harness you can see both nipples
And 3rd one looks exactly like the text on ruins one of the dark reapers stands on.
That colour scheme is horrific. Also, for something called "contrast" there isn't a whole lot of contrast in em. The engines on the bastiladon look good though.GW Community guy paints seraphon army for contrast example.
https://www.warhammer-community.com...seraphongw-homepage-post-3fw-homepage-post-2/
I like the layerbuilding, It makes the pattern look very easy to do. Though what he said about the yellow + blue making green makes me wonder how comfortable it'l be to use without accidently screwing up frequently. It's not that bad on the carnosaur cuz the colours mixing where the scales go to skin doesn't look too weird, but on say an armour plate it'd look weird. And correcting by applying the base again seems a tad annoying, I'd rather just apply the blue multiple times to eventually actually hide the yellow instead of creating green.
Miniwargamming did a carnasour in contrast paints. Looks great, but shows how the colors can bleed and blend. However that can be mitigated by being more careful or going over with the base color used to prime and then using the contrast paint again in that area.
Hope, that's not true. Such a hard hit to thunderquake, but only minor drops here and there for mostly useless units, that won't make them instantly useful.