• The forum software have been upgraded to the latest version.

    If you notice anything that looks off, or does not work, please let us know.

    For more information, click here.

AoS NEW *rumor*

Old wording: " before attempting to cast a spell with a SLANN general, you can say that it will carry out celestial conjuration instead. If you do so, you receive 3 celestial conjuration points instead of being able to attempt to cast that spell."

New wording: "before attempting to cast the first spell with each friendly SLANN or ORACLE, you can say that it will carry out a celestial conjuration. If you do so, you receive D3 celestial conjuration points but the number of spells which that model can attempt to cast in that phase is reduced by 1."

I think the new wording is pretty clearly intended to only work once per hero phase.


Sure, i believe that RAI is as you say. ATM i wouldn't play it differently.

But RAW leaves space for abìmbiguity:
1) before attempting to cast 1st spell: Slann carries out a celestial conj
2) the number of spell the Slann can attempt is reduced by 1
3) The Slann still has to attempt the casting of its 1st spell, so it can carry out another celestial conj
 
whatever something something something chaos
af5c3c88.jpg
 
Wow, I had to search for this at the second page of threads... that hasn't happened before.

anyhow, there is a new Rumour Engine out.

New Rumour Engine is Up:

20-03-24-re-jpg.68444


Some one-handed stabbing weapon. Do you guys know something of this at any faction?

Grrr, Imrahil

Check it at the Rumour Engine 2020 thread.

Grrr, Imrahil
 
To put some life into this thread:
https://www.warhammer-community.com...ehemat-what-we-know-so-fargw-homepage-post-3/

First article on Sons of Bohemat.
I like what I read, some of it is just basic stuff, but I'm intrigued by this:

Warhammer Community said:
Indeed, stories tell of even larger gargants, vast creatures closer in size and ferocity to their lost father than their already huge kin…

I wonder what size we need to think of... and if those will be GW of FW:confused:
I hope GW and pretty large, 2 times a Gargant.

Grrr, Imrahil
 
Hate Knight-like armies, tbh. Knights were either broken or underwhelming, as far as I can remember. But we'll see, how GW plays it.
 
I like knight armies because it’s 4 models I have to build and paint lol. I don’t know if I’ll like these though. GW giants are gross and stupid and drunk. I like my giants to be serious and smart with armor and giant weapons. Kinda like the D&D giants.
 
I like knight armies because it’s 4 models I have to build and paint lol. I don’t know if I’ll like these though. GW giants are gross and stupid and drunk. I like my giants to be serious and smart with armor and giant weapons. Kinda like the D&D giants.
Meh, drunk giants have their appeal, but I do hope they'l have something more to it than that. 90% of destruction consists of gross, fairly stupid creatures. A giant faction doesn't seem like it'd add much.

Hate Knight-like armies, tbh. Knights were either broken or underwhelming, as far as I can remember. But we'll see, how GW plays it.
mwha, I like them from a fluff & model perspective. So in that sense I'm curious.
 
Good thing my boys recently finished building the Soul Wars Nighthaunt.
 
This is not mine randomly found it while searching lizardmen bloodbowl team but this shows GW really missed the ball with the lizards release, i would be replacing my 50 Saraus in a heartbeat if the new ones looked like that.
 

Attachments

  • IMG-20200417-WA0000.jpg
    IMG-20200417-WA0000.jpg
    96.4 KB · Views: 45
Back
Top