1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

AoS "Determining Damage (D3)"

Discussion in 'Rules Help' started by Ixt, Mar 18, 2016.

  1. Ixt
    Troglodon

    Ixt Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    604
    Likes Received:
    353
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Well, this is a pickle.

    Our Oldblood on a Carnosaur scores 3 hits and 3 wounds with its Sunstone Spear, and our opponent fails 3 saves. So, what's the damage?

    The profile reads 'D3,' but where do we go from here? Do we make a single roll to determine damage, or do we roll our 3 wounding dice separately?

    Here are the relevant rules:

    Under 'Tools of War':
    "If a rule requires you to roll a D3, roll a dice
    and halve the total, rounding fractions up."

    Reading way into it, of course, 'a dice' sounds singular... but that might not be enough. Let's go further.

    The 'Attacking' section - which seems to proceed as 'Hit > Wound > Save > Damage' - gives the impression that damage comes last, but...

    "In order to make several attacks at once, all
    of the attacks must have the same
    To Hit, To
    Wound, Rend and Damage characteristics,
    and must be directed at the same enemy
    unit. If this is the case, make all of the hit
    rolls at the same time, then all of the wound
    rolls, and finally all of the save rolls; then
    add up the total number of wounds caused."

    I'm confused! Does this mean that our Oldblood's damage is determined by a single D3? Truthfully, I'd prefer it that way: the Starseer becomes an instant friend thanks to 'Curse of Fates.' That Sunstone Spear is going to be 3-damage more often than not with a Starseer around.

    Can anyone weigh in? Truthfully, I tend to avoid Carnosaurs. I'm traumatized by a Cannon-heavy meta at my FLGS during 8th's prominence, so I haven't actually fielded any since. x_x

    It seems, to me, that the damage wrought by all attacks is resolved with a single roll, but I dunno. It does sound that we have to re-establish Damage for different targets; for example, if the Oldblood targets two separate units, it has to redetermine damage for the second unit.
     
  2. Bowser
    Slann

    Bowser Third Spawning

    Messages:
    5,581
    Likes Received:
    8,452
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I think they have to be rolled separately. You only roll all attacks at once if it's same to hit, to wound, rend and damage. With variable damage you would technically roll all separate. That's how I have played it, but I could be wrong.
     
    Last edited: Mar 18, 2016
    Ixt likes this.
  3. n810
    Slann

    n810 First Spawning

    Messages:
    8,103
    Likes Received:
    6,520
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Roll a separate D3 for each unsaved wound. :bookworm:
    (after all the other rolls and decisions)
     
    Bowser likes this.
  4. Ixt
    Troglodon

    Ixt Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    604
    Likes Received:
    353
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Hmm... maybe 'the same Damage characteristics' technically includes the 'd3' damage characteristic? *shrug* Rats! ;) Still, the more I read it, the more it references 'the damage characteristic of the weapon,' which makes it sounds that the weapon only has a single damage characteristic, not multiple damage characteristics based on the number of successful wounds. I mean, pretty much everything that I'm reading points back to there being only a single roll...

    I suppose that if you guys are right, Curse of Fates + Sunstone Spear still isn't bad, basically equating to +1 damage.
     
    Last edited: Mar 18, 2016
    Bowser likes this.
  5. Tlac'Natai the Observer
    Cold One

    Tlac'Natai the Observer Active Member

    Messages:
    110
    Likes Received:
    155
    Trophy Points:
    43
    I'm fairly certain that you roll a separate D3 for each wound unsaved. I see your train of thought regarding the rules to roll multiple attacks, but the fact is that the damage is random. The damage characteristic technically is the same, it's D3, so you're right there. But then you need to roll each one individually because they were each different attacks. You can't just roll a 5 for dmg and apply that number to all three attacks.

    If it went the way you're thinking about it, you would roll the damage BEFORE you start attacking, and declare "my next 3 attacks will do this much damage", but I don't think it works this way.

    Unrelated, but I love when one attack gets through unsaved, and it ends up killing 2 or 3 models hahaha
     
    Bowser and Ixt like this.
  6. Ixt
    Troglodon

    Ixt Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    604
    Likes Received:
    353
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Yeah, that's how I've always played it... but it's just occurred to me that there's no concrete wording either way. >_< I can't support either conclusion without a non-sequitur. Bleh! I suppose I'll go with the less explosive option (though, for argument's sake, it's also the less risky option) until I see some hard proof either way.

    You wouldn't have to declare prior to attacking, though. It'd work the same way: hit, wound, save, damage. Difference is that you'd decide how much damage with a single die rather than multiple.

    I love that too! Nothing like the 'hella-cleave' that drops a few mooks.
     
  7. Crowsfoot
    Slann

    Crowsfoot Guardian of Paints Staff Member

    Messages:
    8,344
    Likes Received:
    14,489
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If you take a weapon that has 3 attacks and does 3 damage and all wounds were unsaved you would apply 9 wounds so a D3 is no different in my eyes, roll a D3 for each unsaved wound caused.
     
    Freddy25 and Bowser like this.
  8. Ixt
    Troglodon

    Ixt Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    604
    Likes Received:
    353
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Well, I've emailed GW. In the past, that's been about as helpful as shouting my question into the night sky. I can't find anything in the rules that points in either direction.
     
  9. Ixt
    Troglodon

    Ixt Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    604
    Likes Received:
    353
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Er... now that I've read through this section for the 90th time, something's occurred to me. It might actually work both ways: rolling a single D3, or rolling several times. There are two procedures for making attacks, and both (in the case of our Oldblood on Carnosaur) seem to be optional - I don't think that there's a "right way" so long as you pick whichever you prefer.

    I know that we're all used to how this worked in 8th edition, but I do find it exceedingly strange that everything is now written in the singular ('the weapon's damage characteristic') and that the rules constantly refer to the weapon itself rather than the model doing the wounding (or the wounds,even). If a weapon has 'a damage characteristic,' then that surely must stay the same no matter how many wounds you've scored? Wouldn't rolling multiple die to determine damage be putting more emphasis on the model's damage output rather than its weapon's capability, the damage of which is, again, regularly mentioned only in the singular throughout the rules (rather than the model)? Can a weapon have several damage characteristics?

    (puts on tinfoil cap)

    Here we go:

    Inside the spoiler is the 'Making Attacks' section.

    MAKING ATTACKS

    Attacks can be made one at a time, or, in
    some cases, you can roll the dice for attacks
    together. The following attack sequence is
    used to make attacks one at a time:


    1. Hit Roll: Roll a dice. If the roll equals
    or beats the attacking weapon’s To Hit
    characteristic, then it scores a hit and you
    must make a wound roll. If not, the attack
    fails and the attack sequence ends.

    2. Wound Roll: Roll a dice. If the roll
    equals or beats the attacking weapon’s
    To Wound characteristic, then it causes
    damage and the opposing player must make
    a save roll. If not, the attack fails and the
    attack sequence ends.

    3. Save Roll: The opposing player rolls a
    dice, modifying the roll by the attacking
    weapon’s Rend characteristic. For example,
    if a weapon has a -1 Rend characteristic,
    then 1 is subtracted from the save roll. If the
    result equals or beats the Save characteristic
    of the models in the target unit, the wound
    is saved and the attack sequence ends. If
    not, the attack is successful, and you must
    determine damage on the target unit.

    4. Determine Damage: Once all of the
    attacks made by a unit have been carried
    out, each successful attack in‘flicts a
    number of wounds equal to the Damage
    characteristic of the weapon. Most weapons
    have a Damage characteristic of 1, but some
    can in‘flict 2 or more wounds, allowing
    them to cause grievous injuries to even the
    mightiest foe, or to cleave through more
    than one opponent with but a single blow!

    In order to make several attacks at once, all
    of the attacks must have the same To Hit, To
    Wound, Rend and Damage characteristics,
    and must be directed at the same enemy
    unit. If this is the case, make all of the hit
    rolls at the same time, then all of the wound
    rolls, and finally all of the save rolls; then
    add up the total number of wounds caused.

    Something that I'd previously looked over is that the entire numbered list is only for making attacks one at a time.

    1st paragraph, final sentence,
    "... The following attack sequence is
    used to make attacks one at a time:
    "

    If you have three attacks, then you're going to be going through that list three times (probably wise if you're trying to kill or wound three specific dudes in a unit, for example). If you choose to play it this way, then it seems inevitable that your D3 damage must be randomized multiple times.

    Oldblood 'Blue' attack 1 against Alpha, 1 hit, 1 wound, 1 failed save, 1 damage.
    Oldblood 'Blue' attack 2 against Musician, 1 hit, 1 wound, 1 failed save, 2 damage.
    Oldblood 'Blue' attack 3 against Standard Bearer, 1 hit, 1 wound, 1 failed save, 3 damage.

    Since these attacks all target different models and they're made one at a time, then, yes, they'd all have different damage characteristics. I can't think of a logical way to finish one attack sequence only to prescribe it a damage characteristic later, because it'd potentially change the outcome of the combat.

    So, that's method 1: rolling 1 attack at a time, getting all of your damage results 1 at a time.

    Method 2 is to roll several attacks at once.

    Final paragraph,
    "In order to make several attacks at once, all
    of the attacks must have the same To Hit, To
    Wound, Rend and Damage characteristics,
    and must be directed at the same enemy
    unit. If this is the case, make all of the hit
    rolls at the same time, then all of the wound
    rolls, and finally all of the save rolls; then
    add up the total number of wounds caused."


    Although all of the attacks have the 'D3' characteristic (which is, in fact, a 'damage characteristic'), 3 separate damage characteristics can occur, which would retroactively violate this rule (unless 'D3' is enough to satisfy it).

    To me, 'D3' is more of a placeholder for a damage characteristic, because 'D3' indicates 3 possible outcomes. You also can't do 'D3' damage, you can only do '1, 2, or 3' damage. I don't think that a randomized damage characteristic bars a player from using this method, I think that it just means that a single roll covers it because that's the only way to ensure a single outcome. If the inverse is true, we'd have to attack one-at-a-time, which I doubt was the intent because they'd not have given us two methods.

    So it'd go,

    Oldblood 'Blue' makes 3 attacks > gets 3 hits > gets 3 wounds > Red fails 3 saves > 'Blue' rolls a single die to get a matching damage characteristic > 'Blue' adds up his wounds.

    Still, there's no concrete wording. I keep getting caught up on this...

    "... each successful attack in‘flicts a
    number of wounds equal to the Damage
    characteristic of the weapon."


    ... because it could so easily go either way, and, yet again, we see the weapon's damage characteristic mentioned in the singular.

    I suppose I'll take the 'majority rules' approach. It seems that it's entirely up to interpretation, unless you feel that 'D3' is a suitable damage characteristic (in which case, there's still no rule for determining how many dice are to be rolled!). I'd figured that I'd just explain where I'm coming from so I don't look all beardy. ;) It seems like either way is legit, each with their own merits and drawbacks.
     
    Last edited: Mar 18, 2016
  10. Crowsfoot
    Slann

    Crowsfoot Guardian of Paints Staff Member

    Messages:
    8,344
    Likes Received:
    14,489
    Trophy Points:
    113
    But if you roll 3 D3 you are making singular attacks, one dice, one attack?

    If your targeting different models do it singular.

    Thats how I do it anyhow.
     
  11. Tlac'Natai the Observer
    Cold One

    Tlac'Natai the Observer Active Member

    Messages:
    110
    Likes Received:
    155
    Trophy Points:
    43
    The last thing that's said in the spoiler:

    "...and finally all of the save rolls; then
    add up the total number of wounds caused."

    No on method 2 haha, I still can't agree with rolling one die to find the damage on 2 or more unsaved attacks. You never get to find out the damage of these type of attacks until a save roll fails, so you would just roll for each unsaved wound. 3 attacks, 2 roll well, 1 saved, you only roll a D3 for damage, right? Now 4 attacks, 3 roll well, 1 saved, now you get to roll 2D3 for damage. The randomness is the damage, you are right to hang on to the "damage characteristic" bit because that is precisely how much damage each unsaved wound will do, D3. Precisely D3 is a weird thing to say haha. I stand by rolling how ever many attacks the weapon is, and adding up damage at the end (without trying to sound argumentative) .

    If you ever do get a reply back from GW, and I'm wrong... I'll be sad. I won't even be mad, I'll just cry.
     
  12. StealthKnightSteg
    Razordon

    StealthKnightSteg Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    346
    Likes Received:
    271
    Trophy Points:
    63
    3 times a d3 and add the results from the 3 rolls to see the total damage done, really don't make it more complicated! ;)
     
    Ixt likes this.
  13. n810
    Slann

    n810 First Spawning

    Messages:
    8,103
    Likes Received:
    6,520
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Roll 3 of these and add the total.
    [​IMG]
    (they have 1-3 printed twice)
     
    StealthKnightSteg, Crowsfoot and Ixt like this.
  14. Rekmeister
    Skink

    Rekmeister Member

    Messages:
    34
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    18
    The new Death book features a mini faq in which it is stated clearly you must roll the damage multiple times.
     
  15. Ixt
    Troglodon

    Ixt Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    604
    Likes Received:
    353
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Oh! That's what I'm looking for. Good to know. Thanks. :)
     
  16. spawning of Bob
    Skar-Veteran

    spawning of Bob Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,911
    Likes Received:
    5,627
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The more I think, the hotter it gets inside this eggshell. There will probably be a point where further thinking will be risky. I don't want to think about whether I have already crossed that line because of the inherent risk.

    You did ask for a non-sequitur, didn't you?

    I see no conflict with a weapon / multiple attacks having a characteristic of D3. Group those together to determine how many hits got through. Then resolve each hit's damage with a separate roll. I can't manufacture a "one roll to rule them all scenario" from what I see in the rules.

    Man, it's getting hot in here.
     
    Bowser likes this.
  17. Ixt
    Troglodon

    Ixt Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    604
    Likes Received:
    353
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Lack of a rule stating what you've said (til Rekmeister posted one), plus many indirect references in the rules hinting a weapon's singular "damage characteristic" rather than the potentially many "characteristics" encouraged by making multiple rolls to resolve a D3 placeholder in a single combat.
     

Share This Page