AoS Seraphon are lawful good demons

[Lord-Marcus]

Or primal good, at that.

Thoughts and discussion about the above titles idea about the metaphysical existence of the lizardmen in AoS?

 

[n810]

Pretty much
yea for AoS.

for 8th LG
but not demons.

 

[Lord-Marcus]

I now realize I have had too many tabs open and posted in the wrong section

 

[Bowser]

Definitely the wrong section, but it says as much in their keywords. Order Daemon. So at the very least Lawful daemon. Good depends on your definition, but for the sake of argument the forces of Order are the good guys in this setting. So lawful good would be the correct classification, with the exception of Slann. They are not actually daemons, they would be closer to minor deities.

 

[NIGHTBRINGER]

posted in the wrong section

Definitely the wrong section

WE'RE BEING INVADED!! TO ARMS!!

 

[Dragonfire]

TO AAAAARRRRRRMMMMMMS

 

[PhoenixTheCat]

CHARGE MY FELLOW STAR LIZARDS!!! DESTROY THEM!!!

 

[Bowser]

Hold back Seraphon, we are allies, their spawning pools have stopped producing, we need not try to drive the Lizardmen extinct.

 

[PhoenixTheCat]

Hold back Seraphon, we are allies, their spawning pools have stopped producing, we need not try to drive the Lizardmen extinct.

Fine. Can I at least destroy @NIGHTBRINGER?

 

[Bowser]

You can certainly try. Good luck to you.

 

[PhoenixTheCat]

You can certainly try. Good luck to you.

Muahahaha. Ya hear that @NIGHTBRINGER? I'm ready for your Sith nonsense! RAAARRRRR!!! FOR BASTET!!!

 

[NIGHTBRINGER]

Fine. Can I at least destroy @NIGHTBRINGER?

You can certainly try. Good luck to you.

@Bowser : you are the greatest good sir. That was exactly the response I was going to make. Thank you for saving me the trouble!

The only addition I was going to make was the inclusion of this -->

 

[Killer Angel]

Fine. Can I at least destroy @NIGHTBRINGER?

I imagine it would go something like this...

C'mon, Phoenix: let's keep threat realistic.
I mean, if you said "I'm going to temporarily inconvenience NIGHTBRINGER!", I'd think "hey, he might really mean it!".

 

[NIGHTBRINGER]

I imagine it would go something like this...

C'mon, Phoenix: let's keep threat realistic.
I mean, if you said "I'm going to temporarily inconvenience NIGHTBRINGER!", I'd think "hey, he might really mean it!".

Hahaha that is too funny!!!


I award a Spiderman to both: @Bowser and @Killer Angel

 

[PhoenixTheCat]

I imagine it would go something like this...

C'mon, Phoenix: let's keep threat realistic.
I mean, if you said "I'm going to temporarily inconvenience NIGHTBRINGER!", I'd think "hey, he might really mean it!".

Okay. I shall temporarily inconviniece him. Also, why does everybody mistake me for a male? Obviously I'm a jelly donut.

 

[NIGHTBRINGER]

Also, why does everybody mistake me for a male? Obviously I'm a jelly donut.

Statistical odds I guess.

Most forum members are male.
A small minority of forum members are female.
You're the first jelly donut.



Stand and be recognized Jelly Donut. So what are the correct pronouns for jelly donuts? Males have he/him/his while females have she/her/hers; we need guidance for jelly donuts.

 

[PhoenixTheCat]

Stand and be recognized Jelly Donut. So what are the correct pronouns for jelly donuts? Males have he/him/his while females have she/her/hers; we need guidance for jelly donuts.

My becoming a jelly donut has inconvenienced you because you shall never know what words to use.

 

[NIGHTBRINGER]

My becoming a jelly donut has inconvenienced you because you shall never know what words to use.

I guess you can't blame your fellow Lustrians for using the wrong pronouns then.

 

[Killer Angel]

This thread is developing toward an interesting direction. I'd really need an armchair and some pop-corn...

 

[NIGHTBRINGER]

This thread is developing toward an interesting direction. I'd really need an armchair and some pop-corn...

This has definitely become quite the strange little thread.