Wrong. First of all frenzy as a special rule is listed in the rule book, therefore it can not automatically override the supporting attacks rule....
No, he did make some arguments which fall apart under closer inspection. While I kind of agree with his counterarguments to point 1 and 2, I also...
The second part of the Supporting Attacks rule is not a rule by itself but rather specifies the circumstances at which the rule applies. The PF...
To be clear, I never argued that PF is not a special rule. I just wanted to illustrate why I and others think that there is a difference between...
You are right, I edited my post above but it doesn't change the meaning of my point.
PF is of course a special rule just like all the other rules you just mentioned. All I said was that most of these special rules follow the basic...
Hello, seems the there has been some discussion since I last posted. I just wanted to explain the difference between PF and other special rules...
Forlustria just illustrated what I wanted to say. At Sleboda: I know where you comming from but IMO you have to look at both rules. 1. The SA...
The main argument pro PF in subsequent ranks is that the PF rule tells us to make an extra attack for every 6 rolled. If you play it that PF works...
Hello all, part of the reason I registered here was the ongoing discussion. I always assumed that PF would not work with supporting attacks for...
Hello, I am a warhammer and lizardmen player since 1997. The lizardmen were my first army but now I am also collecting orcs and goblins and wood...