Nope, player A sets the terrains, picked by the players from the listed pieces. then the faction terrains are set "in addition to the features...
The point is: new rules override the ones already there. so, that rule should simply replace the "old" restriction of the terrain warscroll, and...
As usual, unclear rules… You read it "this is the new general rule, unless the warscroll of the terrain got different rules" i read it as "this is...
To be fair, if they launch a thing as "the old world", with all the related rumors about square bases, AND then they don't let you use the old...
ATM my new GHB hasn't arrived. Could you post a pic of the exact rule?
[IMG]
it would be nice and helpful, but it would also require some serious work, just to move in the new positions all the existing threads. but...
You "forced" (;)) me to do a research.
Yes, FAQ and publications more recent than the battletome, update and override it. Sometime it's a nerf, sometime it's a boost.
Here you are. It's a pretty big box
"So let it be written, so let it be done."
"thou shall not indulge in lenghty arguments"
this thread is going deliciously wild...
I don't have the GHB, so i wasn't able to check. Then it's not so bad. Still abusable, but in a lesser way.
GW really masters the art of writing rules without even thinking about the possible consequences. To faq them hard later because "this was not...
Is again that time of the year?
If goonhammer is true, player A chooses the features.
With the incoming GHB 2020, i will update the overview (surely for the whole part regarding realms artefacts and the Realmshape engine, but I'm...
Yes, now the faction terrains must be placed at more than 1" from obj, so as long as it's at less than 3", a garrisoned unit controls the obj