Meh, at least we should try to limit it to fantasy and do 40k in a different thread
This thread makes me happy. Not only for Tomb Kings, but also for my poor dwarfs, that survived the end times in a very small number. (all those...
So many memories... :D
Yeah, for a brief time, i came really close to collect them... my favorite flavor of elves. :p
Imo wanderers alone, without the sylvaneth part that once was the second half of wood elves, cannot stand on their own.
I think that would be perfect
Exactly that one.
For the life of me I cannot find the link. However, the previews about the next releases by GW were: FEB Battletome Death Battletome custodes...
I like it. So not only TK, but also all the neglected armies that were "discarded" by GW but still live in our hearts.
Sure! The raw debate was closed in the previous page, now is just a discussion on tastes :)
But... but this way we'd lose the excuse for spamming them across the board! :p
It's dangerous to go that route. Because i could say that if you lose a Slann that is not replaceable at all, you lose even if you won by...
Don't remember the details, i just know he went against Rome
Almost . Phyrrus won TWO battles... And those were enough to cripple the army of his reign. ;) In AoS armies are more numerous than the ones of...
This sums it perfectly After a sufficiently large number of phyrric victories, you lose the war.
That would be in line with the news regarding the next-to-come tome for elves...
Precisely. [IMG]
SCE mentality should fit perfectly with 40k... :D
Almost everything in WHFB was more complex than its counterpart in AoS. With much complexity, the "entry barrier" for FB was higher than AoS....
Yep, tabling your opponent should grant a Minor Victory (if the opponent got more VPs than you). "only" minor, because at least is an...