that message being you can make the most non-synergistic Seraphon army ever and still inflict enough MW spam to make Tzeench cry?
EEEWWWW look at the AOS player lol a second start collecting is not a bad idea, however if you are new, my advice would be to get a start...
which is why "what it is" is the debate more so than "what it should be" :)
eh that too is part of the debate. I personally would go with the 510 because GW specifically said Seraphon were NOT updated in the GHB due to...
any leak is advantageous to the opponents of individuals that regularly go 4+ wins... competitive means competitive lol
no.... it was like 350 for a while then they bumped it to 420 so other armies couldn't take it as an ally
ok I love the break down. im inclined to say 510 will remain. gentlemens bet? :)
when they feel like it, and usually a little after the release of a new edition, or a significant change in rules/stats to a unit they make
not even close. its pure logic mate. either your claim is that it is 420 and that is referenced by "stay as is", or you are agreeing that it is...
yes I am an obstinate PITA for sure lol. but always backed with fact and LOGIC. welcome to the forums, I sincerely hope you know that while I can...
no I didn't realize that because your current claim of "where it is" is 420. thank you for the clarification.
except the points after the warscroll got updated to the current one WERE officially 510... that's a fact, not conjecture.
or maybe you might be a little ridiculous about this at this point. *shrug* There is ZERO chance 105 "effective" wounds on zero rend only costs...
ok now if @Grotpunter also agrees with me, then I will have proof that hell as frozen over lmao. or that this POV was that far out there lol
skinks need to be in 40 man units and buffed by starpriest if you want to do damage, or they need to be in 10 man units to act as sacrificial...