Cold One
Pofadder
Member
- Messages
- 125
- Likes Received
- 0
- Trophy Points
- 16
Please take up you armybooks and the BRB and lend me your wisdom.
The following situation occurs:
I have deployed in all their glory a unit of temple guard. during character/s deployment I deploy a scar veteran on foot in the temple guard, then I deploy Venerable Lord Kroak in the same magnificent unit of temple guard.
Kroak's special rule gives every model in the unit he joins the Unbreakable special rule.
The BRB does not allow a "breakable" character to join an unbreakable unit...
If my grasp of the english language does not fail me I read Kroak's special rule as all encompassing saying that it makes every model unbreakable including the hero I have placed in there before placing Kroak.
I was told the way I did things was against the spirit of the rule... Which I think was an exaggeration to start with because it certainly seemed plain to me that I was within RAW. Secondly, my intent was certainly not to bend / break the rules ( I ended up playing him separately). Because I detest rules differences detracting from the fun of a table top game. That does not mean that I just want to lie down and accept every other opinion from an opponent as law.
WHat sayeth my cold-blooded bretheren. Am I a snake? (For this purpose do not let my forum name count against me please)
The following situation occurs:
I have deployed in all their glory a unit of temple guard. during character/s deployment I deploy a scar veteran on foot in the temple guard, then I deploy Venerable Lord Kroak in the same magnificent unit of temple guard.
Kroak's special rule gives every model in the unit he joins the Unbreakable special rule.
The BRB does not allow a "breakable" character to join an unbreakable unit...
If my grasp of the english language does not fail me I read Kroak's special rule as all encompassing saying that it makes every model unbreakable including the hero I have placed in there before placing Kroak.
I was told the way I did things was against the spirit of the rule... Which I think was an exaggeration to start with because it certainly seemed plain to me that I was within RAW. Secondly, my intent was certainly not to bend / break the rules ( I ended up playing him separately). Because I detest rules differences detracting from the fun of a table top game. That does not mean that I just want to lie down and accept every other opinion from an opponent as law.
WHat sayeth my cold-blooded bretheren. Am I a snake? (For this purpose do not let my forum name count against me please)