Strewart don't make stuff up. It in no way says that THE UNIT does not fire. It also doesn't say that that razordon doesn't fire either, it just says rather blankly "no shots or fire.
What it does say however is....
If you roll a misfire on either of the dice, no
shots are fired and the unit loses D3 Skinks. If
both roll a misfire, no shots are fired and the
unit loses 2D3 Skinks instead.
Which becomes more clear when you read:
What happens if a Razordon stands and
shoots and both artillery dice roll a Misfire?
Are 2D3 Skinks eaten? And if only one artillery
dice rolls a Misfire? Do we have 1D3 Skinks
eaten and still a number of shots given by the
other dice?
If "a razordon" misfires, do we have a number of shots given by the other dice?
Answer: no shots are fired.
The question specifically references "a razordon", I.E. a singular, non-plural razordon. Leading to two potential conclusions
1. The F.A.Q. doesn't have anything to do with units with multiple Razordons since the question itself only mentions "a razordon".
2. The razordons are rolled for individually to determine how many total shots each contributes, if any, with "a razordon" having the "no shots are fired" rule applied to it, and how many individual skinks each one would kill, if any, and the effects tallied up and resolved afterwards.
Note that that doesn't say, "no shots are fired, and if any WERE fired previously, discount those, and discount any potential future shots that other razordons in the unit may fire". It also doesn't say, "if any razordon misfires, they all fire no shots. "
This still weakens the razordon over the idea that it can misfire and still fire pews, but isn't as shit-tastically worthless as the idea that if any of the six razordon dice are misfires then you discount them all and cry. Take a razordon or something, they are balanced, to my knowledge G.W. hasn't printed anything that's not balanced.
I would also like to point out the differences in language between the countries of Australia and England, people will point out that in English R.A.W., they tend towards the idea that if it isn't stated as specifically forbidden it isn't stated at all and it's up to your judge/judgement.
At the very least, I've given you a very plausible argument in favor of the razordon not sucking totally. Use it with your opponents, talk with your judge, and they'll likely see things your way. The best way to deal with it is the appeal to reason, jut ask, "what sense would it make that a larger group of razordons is actually worse then just one?".
