• The forum software have been upgraded to the latest version.

    If you notice anything that looks off, or does not work, please let us know.

    For more information, click here.

AoS NEW *rumor*

Erta Wanderer said:
a few tings make me think so first it says priests not starmasters so no slann in the city. meaning that the residence are flesh and blood seraphon which are few and far between. second we can not alie into cities armies so whatever force we do have in a city is either very small or not of a military nature.
Click to expand...
I agree that its more likely that its skink priests rather than slaan that are leading these conclaves never really thought otherwise but gw has been rather vague when it comes to the Seraphons numbers and composition especially in the current timeline so with what little w have to go on we can only speculate these conclaves size and operation. Though there are cults in Chamon dedicated to Sotek so maybe they got a bigger establishment there if Seraphon even still worship Sotek. Or better yet Sotek is another conjured memory of the Slann...

What armies can ally with seem to be at odds with itself with certain armies able to ally with another but not vice versa but these sometimes change over time with each release. An example being Ironjaws couldn't ally with gloomspite but now they can with the latest book while gloomspite can't ally with them. Not a far stretch Seraphon alliances could change in the future.
 
Duo Sonata said:
I agree that its more likely that its skink priests rather than slaan that are leading these conclaves never really thought otherwise but gw has been rather vague when it comes to the Seraphons numbers and composition especially in the current timeline so with what little w have to go on we can only speculate these conclaves size and operation. Though there are cults in Chamon dedicated to Sotek so maybe they got a bigger establishment there if Seraphon even still worship Sotek. Or better yet Sotek is another conjured memory of the Slann...
Click to expand...
maby so but until we do know we have to work with what we have and the last we herd definitively we are rare beyond reason

Duo Sonata said:
What armies can ally with seem to be at odds with itself with certain armies able to ally with another but not vice versa but these sometimes change over time with each release. An example being Ironjaws couldn't ally with gloomspite but now they can with the latest book while gloomspite can't ally with them. Not a far stretch Seraphon alliances could change in the future.
Click to expand...
yes but it is soposed to reflect the lore and if we had a major force in any of the cities i would find it very hard to beleave we wouldn't fight for that city. and with this latest book bringing almost every order army into the fold with all armies that do live there being alies. why arn't we? the only factions cities can't alie with are us.
 
Theres several questionable design choices in that cities book like being forced to choose 1 of 7 cities all of which belong to only 2 of the realms despite the lore even in that book showing cities in all the realms so i guess its not the best example to use ruleswise
 
Duo Sonata said:
Theres several questionable design choices in that cities book like being forced to choose 1 of 7 cities all of which belong to only 2 of the realms despite the lore even in that book showing cities in all the realms so i guess its not the best example to use ruleswise
Click to expand...
but the passage in question is in the book if we are going to ignore said book then this entire conversation is pointless.
 
Duo Sonata said:
Theres several questionable design choices in that cities book like being forced to choose 1 of 7 cities all of which belong to only 2 of the realms despite the lore even in that book showing cities in all the realms so i guess its not the best example to use ruleswise
Click to expand...
meh, that's simply cuz they can only make so many different rulesets. Its the same reason 40K only has a handfull of space marine chapters with special rules despite there being what, 100's? 1000's of chapters by now each with their own unique style of warfare.

Admitadly, they could've split up the cities a bit more over the realms but I guess there aren't that many well established and fleshed out cities yet...
 
welp bone reapers are entirely immune to batle shock that's fun it's not like we needed more of that
OBR-Faction-Focus-Oct22-RanksUnbroken23sdg.jpg and there cavalry is scary
 

Attachments

  • OBR-Faction-Focus-Oct22-DeathriderWedge8sdgr.jpg
    OBR-Faction-Focus-Oct22-DeathriderWedge8sdgr.jpg
    53.3 KB · Views: 17
and there units are going to be realy powerfull the 4 headed guys can get rend -3 or reroll hits or reroll wound or reroll saves and there standerd battle line has 4+ rerolling saves natural. huh welp all hail our new bone overlords (sigh)
 
Canas said:
yeah the new bone people seem to be rather overpowered from the snippets they've shown in their army spotlight
Click to expand...
i mean i get it they are saposed to be a super elite army and their costs will reflect that but im having trouble seeing how we are going to deal with them our standerd anti elte strategies wont work on them.
 
Ossiarchs aren't death, they are Tyranids. look at the arms on them... those are literally tyranide arms, even down to the spike growths coming off the arms like batmans gauntlets. their bodies are those of tyrranid warriors. even nids weapons... "bone swords"..... I refuse to acknowledge them as death. they have stolen my Nids…
 
Sorry to the nay sayers,but that feast of bones box set looks f**king awesome!

Boo hoo, so sad, bye bye Tomb kings. But look things change and move on.

I am a massive ogre fan! The lore is hilarious. Ogres are cool because they are ignorant, but fearless and powerful.

Also this new death faction. If you compare it to Tomb Kings you won't like it. Its not Tomb Kings, its something new.

You have to embrace it as something new. If it borrows from Tomb Kings, so what, everything borrows from everything. Obviously Tomb Kings didn't work, or they would be a main faction. But they keep the idea alive and adapt it to try a new approach.
 
samheim said:
Sorry to the nay sayers,but that feast of bones box set looks f**king awesome!

Boo hoo, so sad, bye bye Tomb kings. But look things change and move on.

I am a massive ogre fan! The lore is hilarious. Ogres are cool because they are ignorant, but fearless and powerful.

Also this new death faction. If you compare it to Tomb Kings you won't like it. Its not Tomb Kings, its something new.

You have to embrace it as something new. If it borrows from Tomb Kings, so what, everything borrows from everything. Obviously Tomb Kings didn't work, or they would be a main faction. But they keep the idea alive and adapt it to try a new approach.
Click to expand...
"you have to embrace it as its something new" weren't you the same guy upset about Cities? lmao
 
samheim said:
Boo hoo, so sad, bye bye Tomb kings. But look things change and move on.
Click to expand...

Apparently you don't understand.
It's not that i don't like ossiarch because they are not tomb kings.
And it's not that i don't like ossiarch because i'm old and these are news... otherwise i wouldn't like things as kharadron or idoneth.
No. I don't like ossiarch because they suck. At least, they suck for my personal tastes.

I have nothing against things that move on, but i cannot be forced to like them if i don't .
At the risk of repeating myself, idoneth are a new army and they are cool.

samheim said:
Obviously Tomb Kings didn't work, or they would be a main faction.
Click to expand...

Are you aware that one of the main problems with TK was the impossibility to totally copyright them, Yes?
It was easier to just erase them, AoS got plenty of other armies ready to be sold .
 
I know well that rules often doesn't reflect fluff, but suspension of disbelief has its limits.

Souls of the greatest warriors forged in golden armor by god himself - get scared and run away.
Denizens of the Chaos Realms who invades into reality - get scared and run away.
Frenzied fanatics, hordes of mindless undead - everyone has its psychological limits and can be forced to flee from battlefield.

But not some skeleton constucts. Nah, they are absolutely fearless.
 
Killer Angel said:
Apparently you don't understand.
It's not that i don't like ossiarch because they are not tomb kings.
And it's not that i don't like ossiarch because i'm old and these are news... otherwise i wouldn't like things as kharadron or idoneth.
No. I don't like ossiarch because they suck. At least, they suck for my personal tastes.

I have nothing against things that move on, but i cannot be forced to like them if i don't .
At the risk of repeating myself, idoneth are a new army and they are cool.



Are you aware that one of the main problems with TK was the impossibility to totally copyright them, Yes?
It was easier to just erase them, AoS got plenty of other armies ready to be sold .
Click to expand...
eye roll at having to explain the trademark issue on the "Seraphon" forums....
 
Killer Angel said:
Apparently you don't understand.
It's not that i don't like ossiarch because they are not tomb kings.
And it's not that i don't like ossiarch because i'm old and these are news... otherwise i wouldn't like things as kharadron or idoneth.
No. I don't like ossiarch because they suck. At least, they suck for my personal tastes.
Click to expand...

Give it time. I am not totally in love with them. But let's see how they develop. I am old as well.

I am open minded to them. They might have really great lore. Some of the models admittedly look a bit silly. The walker was questionable idea.

But some people really love them. To be honest, I like the new GW that takes more risks and does more new stuff.


Settra had his day. His story was completed. And really Settra was another Nagash. I liked Settra a lot. But, lets see how the new guys develop.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top