That is unfortunate. Just curious, is there something specific that your group/meta dislikes about 9th age?
I'll try to sum the different positions:
Player A: I play (ad collect) only official GW material, and AoS is cooler than you think.
Player B: AoS is fun! But we can play also 8th 'cause I like it.
Player C: AoS sucks. I like 8th before End Times, and i think it would be fun to do also some 7th. No interest in 9th, because (unclear reasons, but essentially he also knows other people and they don't play it)
Player D: The shop's owner. 9th could be cool, but he goes where money are, so he supports AoS, and will still play old editions for fun
Player E: he doesn't play no more
Player F: it's me. I'm the last one joining the group, and I'm facing this. I tried to support 9th (giving pdfs and trying to boost it), but in the end I failed. Which means: I can play AoS, or old WHFB editions. Which
is a pity, but at least I can play.
Plus, there are positive facts, anyway: I was interested in WH since decades (I've played with the first edition of Space Hulk), but I really started the hobby only with 8th (that's another story). But I have old armybooks (lizard and dwarfs), so I'm happy to test for the first time also the old editions.
For me, it's all new stuff: the last month I've played my
first game ever of 7th, with a list with Tetto, a Slann (heavens) and a skink priest, casting 3 Casandora in the first turn, and it was a total fun!
