ALL SCE are bad. If I were the emperor of the world I would have them all outlawed and melted down. Owning one would be a capital offence.
Wow, that’s a burn if I ever saw one.How does @NIGHTBRINGER respond to this challenge to his authority?
And sometimes that "True Fan" is correct, case in point (from your example):
View attachment 44156
If you want to praise Warhammer's equivalent to Michael Bay's Transformers, you go right ahead. I've learned long ago that you can't teach someone good taste (but that doesn't mean that their poor taste can't be ridiculed).
Throwing fuel on the fire are we?
Except that post made by @ravagekitteh was in response of my ridicule of SCE... not AoS in general. As I've said before, AoS does have a few interesting factions (Kharadron Overlords, Daughters of Khaine, Deepkin, Fyreslayers), but I do not consider SCE to be among them. The point being, that I was likening SCE to Michael Bay's Transformers, and not AoS as a whole (at least in this instance, although now that you mention it....
)Throwing fuel on the fire are we?
Nope, I’m staying out of this one, just sitting back and relaxing while this battle unfolds, and gathering my strength until the next one.
As evidenced by:Wow, that’s a burn if I ever saw one.
those dragon creatures?Except that Michael Bay’s Transformers didn’t have anything as awesome as Kharadron Overlords:
They’re there to kick ass and swig beer, and they can’t swig beer while they have their diving suits on...
Nope, I’m staying out of this one, just sitting back and watching this battle unfold, and gathering my strength until the next one that even remotely involves me.
No the dwarves.
I was asking what the dragon like creatures are
Except that post made by @ravagekitteh was in response of my ridicule of SCE... not AoS in general. As I've said before, AoS does have a few interesting factions (Kharadron Overlords, Daughters of Khaine, Deepkin, Fyreslayers), but I do not consider SCE to be among them. The point being, that I was likening SCE to Michael Bay's Transformers, and not AoS as a whole (at least in this instance, although now that you mention it....
By "throwing fuel on the fire", I wasn't implying that you were joining the battle, merely "encouraging" the battle between @ravagekitteh and myself.
Well these are Faction Focus, not GHB Focus. I don't expect them to tell me about how, for exemple, measuring is now base to base and piling in changed in a Beastclaw Raider focused article. Some factions won't be changed that much by the new edition, so these little tweaks like point costs and nerf/buffs are actually THE big information about them.
Warhammer Be gettin’ xtra wacky.)
it significantly nerfs our skink vassals as even with the added range from the skinks we're still liable to be in range of the dispell. And since our slann already could unbind from far away we don't benefit from it either.
That's rather much of a consolation prize... unless summoning becomes impressivly effective we can't view that as a real boon.
I assume they just keep the re-rolls permanently. Not like anyone really used the ability for anything else..
I like the ones that give actual new info, like the current one with the base to base measuring. It actually has something "valuable" to add. Yes, point reductions are important as well. But I'd assume point changes with any new version of the GHB and 5 articles going "yup, we're changing some points here too" don't really add much. It's also not like they go massivly in depth with the point reductions and point out various new army compositions that can now viably be build as it's become cheap enough.
