Been a while for this thread, I am still reading as always but no time for posting.
Interesting article I found today about this picture:
As much as it LOOKS like an ancient long-lost Mayan plaque, potentially depicting an Atlantis-destruction myth... it looks a bit fake to me.
Three Things I immediately noticed from looking at the picture:
1)
The boat. Doesn't look like the Mayan canoe I have seen in the artwork before, it looks like someone drew in an imaginative turtle shell. The paddles don't look right either. Here is a picture I have, I will need to find the source, to show what I mean. This depicts the Mayan paddler gods (frequently depicted in Mayan artwork) rowing a boat with several spirit-animals on their way to the underworld:
Doesn't look the same to me.
2)
Perspective. Unlike European artwork, which developed perspective (depth) in their artwork over many centuries, the Mayans never had time to develop this concept in their artwork or their stonework. Here is an example of a Mayan stelae (from the Kimbell art museum, I have seen this one in real life

)
This carving shows all the Mayans in the portrait on the same plane of the picture. The artist was unable to show a room in depth, with the king in the background, the supplicant (to the right) walking towards him, and the other attendants on either side. Instead they are arrayed to show each picture in detail, and that's about it.
Another good example is the amazing battle scene of Bonampak. Lots of detail, but all on a 2D artist plane, and no sense of depth or real scale at all, something the photograph DOES show with the volcano in the far background.
3)
Alleged origin at Tikal. That's where it the picture was from: a carving at Tikal. It doesn't look like any Mayan carving from the city at Tikal that I have ever seen. There are too many to actually depict here, but here is a favorite of mine:
More pictures and info on
Stela 31 on
page 5, but suffice to say even though Tikal has a ton of different stela and carving styles throughout there history, the guy in the photo doesn't match any I have seen. Even the feathers on the rower's helmet look fake, something out of a north-american headdress rather an an ancient Mayan carving. And no hieroglyphs!? Granted not all the glyph inscriptions survived to the modern day, but not even a single one? Or a fragment of one? Suspicious...
So in summary, this picture looks like it was a drawing someone in the modern day created.
Here are some good articles on the topic, in case you are interested! The authors did a lot more research into the Mayan-Atlantis myths than I did.
Did the Maya Depict the End of Atlantis at Tikal?
Atlantis, Mu, and the Maya?
Big thing I learned from them was the Mayan-revival style invented in around the 20s or 30s during the Art Deco area. I have seen artwork and architecture like this in San Antonio, TX before, I hope I can find more examples in the future!
