Skink Chief
ILKAIN
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 1,845
- Likes Received
- 3,389
- Trophy Points
- 113
Japan has closed schools, can confirmYeah, I heard about two girls. Wild.
I know in Moscow they now restricting room change in schools - every class now must be in one room. To prevent movement and potentially decease transportation.
Isn't that was in South Korea? Not Japan.
Don't comment often, but just wanted to address this idea.
I would caution against underestimating how severe a 2% mortality rate can be. Especially with something as infectious as the flu or this coronavirus. If this is not properly contained and say 10 million people are ultimately infected worldwide, a 2% mortality rate is two hundred thousand lives lost. That is more people than the amount that live in 98% of U.S (only 310 U.S. cities have a population > than 100,000).
Even if treatment can be better in other parts of the world, say the mortality rate drops to 1%, I would still say this coronavirus is very concerning based on how infectious it is.
you are making the same mistake activists do when they try to make something seem worse than it is (not saying you are doing that, just that you are making the same mistake) which is comparing a widespread issue that shall affect a small portion of the population in any given area to the population count of a given area. effectively saying that 200,000 lives lost is no small thing (using a world case count) and comparing it to a single city in the US is not an actual comparative... yes it would be devastating if Providence Rhode island suddenly had zero people ( my capitol city has a population just under 200k) but not all the deaths are occurring in that location.
this is similar to the baby doll vaccine meme. an anti vaccine group posted a picture of a doll with a needle in it for every single shot a baby in the US is expected to get by age 2. it looks scary. until you realize that if you took that same doll and put a pair of lipstick lips on it for every affectionate interaction it would receive in the same time line, or really any single item over any amount of time.
TLDR, the comparative you used is disingenuous because it reduces the actual occurrence rates either by geography or time, and doesn't account for the actual comparative you should be using which is the world population.
7,700,000,000 total people
0,010,000,000 cases of corona virus
0,000,200,000 deaths at 98% survival rate
7,700,000,000 divided by
0,000,200,000 equals
0.0000259% of the population lost to corona.
compare that to the black death which killed
75,000,000 of a world population (in 1350) of
300,000,000 or
25% of the world
and you can see exactly how much of a non issue this is. hell the common flu has a 98% survival rate lol