• The forum software have been upgraded to the latest version.

    If you notice anything that looks off, or does not work, please let us know.

    For more information, click here.

AoS NEW *rumor*

Erta Wanderer said:
and being usles is better? we didn't want it to stay the same but we didn't want them to burn everything to the ground and salt the ashes.
some of the stuf got better some of it much better but it came at the cost of not fixing any thing else and nurfing so many things into the ground. we where alredy bad we didn't need for things to get worse
Click to expand...

The book isn't worse
 
Erta Wanderer said:
you can but warriors are better line troops now for holding objectives 3 salamanders and a block of 40 saurus do work
Click to expand...

i'm actually in that space right now

i think the biggest problem is all the buffs are wholly within, most cost command points, and at the end of the day you probably just want more units.

The hero breakdown will be interesting.
 
Putzfrau said:
i'm actually in that space right now

i think the biggest problem is all the buffs are wholly within, most cost command points, and at the end of the day you probably just want more units.

The hero breakdown will be interesting.
Click to expand...
take what buffes what your taking old blood on foot and sunblood for suarus skink priest for salamanders and monsters add as much spell casting as you think you need and at least one star priest for MWs
 
Erta Wanderer said:
take what buffes what your taking old blood on foot and sunblood for suarus skink priest for salamanders and monsters add as much spell casting as you think you need and at least one star priest for MWs
Click to expand...

See, that's already a ton of points in heroes that aren't really all that great outside their buffs. The skinks heroes are also 5 wound, shit save models so anything with any kind of shooting attack is taking them off no problem. I think you'll see even less. A small, tight list of heroes and then just tons of units.
 
Putzfrau said:
See, that's already a ton of points in heroes that aren't really all that great outside their buffs. The skinks heroes are also 5 wound, shit save models so anything with any kind of shooting attack is taking them off no problem. I think you'll see even less. A small, tight list of heroes and then just tons of units.
Click to expand...
well thats why i don't plan on taking both skinks and warriors pick one or the other and go with it
 
Boshea said:
Considering the results Seraphon have been putting out in tournaments, and that we've been living off of GHB, Seraphon was doing pretty good before this tome. We have better performance than some of the armies that got new books.
Click to expand...
Getting high placings required you to be really really good and even then relied on a few gimmicks (and ignoring half the book) to get the army to any sensible placing.
 
Boshea said:
Considering the results Seraphon have been putting out in tournaments, and that we've been living off of GHB, Seraphon was doing pretty good before this tome. We have better performance than some of the armies that got new books.
Click to expand...
but you don't like skinks spam. and that wasn't my point as a faction we where entirely dependent on our cheesy bulshit as all of our warscrolls(the thing that where already bad) did nothing for us
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top