Raising Awareness of the CCP in the news [POLITICAL]

Their algorithms demonetize everything. Generally, if a video has any indication or hint of violence, it'll increase its chances of getting demonetized.

 

hahahahaha

 

Though I've not been taking part in this thread for a long time, I've been watching it and here are my views.

I certainly agree China is a very great threat, that is making the world a lot more of a mess than it could be. And not just with China but also in the West, with regards to the debate between @Paradoxical Pacifism and @Scalenex, the left wing is by far the greater threat right now than the right. Whenever someone in a Western country says anything at least remotely patriotic, they are automatically set-upon by the extreme left and denounced as 'Nazis', 'racists', 'homophobes' and 'sexists', and encourage others to do the same, while when anyone says something that is leftist in the extreme nobody bats an eyelid, because they're afraid of the left-wing gangs on social media encouraging them to be ostracised from society. In this way the left-wing is suppressing freedom of speech. It's just lucky that at least in the UK the majority spoke out against it by voting Conservative rather than Labour (who have become pretty much a Communist party), but even with this the left wing is still causing a lot of trouble here.

Many of our national institutions are being brainwashed by the left. The BBC is a left-wing mouthpiece when it should be a neutral broadcaster, and it and other government organisations are sometimes openly racist to white people in their recruitment advertisements (job adverts for them that only allow 'people of ethnic minorities' to apply are not uncommon), all the worse because white people are the natives and the majority in this country. Companies have biased edicts that require a specific minimum of people from ethnic minorities to be recruited, yet no such luxury applies to whites. Local councils and universities pander to BLM protesters who cause riots and defile historic monuments like Warhammer Beastmen, which simply encourages them to do it again and again because they'll know they'll get their way by doing it. Probably the biggest act of injustice that the left have caused is that schools can be marked down by OFSTED for having 'too many white children' which is without a doubt racist. Not to mention that the British Empire is being painted as an evil neo-Nazi regime, even though it did a lot of good as well as bad and that nobody pays any attention to the similarly brutal atrocities black people have committed against each other (African kings selling their people to slave traders, the Zulu Empire massacring rival tribes, e.t.c).

As well as encouraging this injustice to occur across the world, I wouldn't be at all surprised if it's Chinese magnates who are paying African poachers to continue practicing the murder of rhinos and elephants in Africa for their horns and tusks respectively, particularly rhinos given the Chinese use rhino horns in their savage medicines that don't work. Rangers on the reserves are doing a great job in shooting poachers and protecting those animals they can save, yet despite the risk of death there is something that still causes some Africans to choose a life of murdering animals, and I wouldn't be at all surprised if that incentive was money coming from the Chinese bigger bad.

The idea of reduced motivation causing unrest to the CCP is an interesting concept, that I hope could cause their regime to crash without the need for war. This would be great for everyone, but it isn't guaranteed that the unrest will be enough to destabilise the CCP, so maybe war is the only answer to free the world from the Red Menace.

Funnily enough the Americans are paranoid about going to war on their own ever since they lost in Vietnam. They want at least one other country to hold their hand for them and accompany them into a conflict, usually Britain (that's how we got into the mess that was Afghanistan, thanks for that one Tony Blair). Certainly they aimed to plan to go into one arena (I forget which), and asked France to join them, who agreed, and then asked Britain to come too. Britain said no, and then coincidentally both America and France decided not to go to fight after all. But to be honest, I'm sceptical as to whether even NATO would be enough to take down China. However, Britain has the Commonwealth to call upon - India has already had some skirmishes with the Chinese and we've been reaffirming the bond between us with Britain sending additional vaccines to help tie down their rampant strain of COVID, and Canada, Australia and New Zealand are loyal friends of ours (especially with the notion of a CANZUK alliance between the four countries in the works now that Britain's free from the spiteful EU). Between NATO and the Commonwealth we would have a lot of resources to use against the CCP, but a World War III would be hideous and potentially could lead to a post-apocalyptic Earth either in the style of Mortal Engines (which predicts a war between the US and China) or (if we're luckier) Star Trek. I am certainly not fond of the idea of another World War happening in my lifetime and I certainly don't want to be murdered by a Chinese nuclear missile or drone strike if I can help it.

 

Please elaborate, I'm interested to hear your views on these matters.

 

African poachers kill animals and sell their parts because there's usually no other economic opportunities for them to take advantage of. Whenever extreme poverty exists, and there isn't many ways to provide for yourself and your family, there exists an increased chance you will turn towards committing crime. Humans are unique in their adaptability towards harsh, unforgiving environments, and can find any means necessary to survive. Unfortunately for many Africans, poaching exists as a means of supporting themselves and their families financially.

Also note that many of these protected spaces in Africa in which endangered species are located originally had humans already living there and those people were forcibly removed without taking into consideration their needs.

Poaching is a pretty complex issue that isn't really solved by killing poachers. They are humans after all—you'd probably do the same thing if you shared their circumstances. Instead, addressing poverty can reduce motivations for people to poach.

 

On the contrary, Labour in the UK certainly became Communist when Jeremy Corbyn took power, and though Starmer isn't anywhere near as bad as Corbyn, there are still neo-Communist politicians in there.

Nope, the BBC is definitely leftist. They do all they can to criticise the Conservatives and glorify Labour and left-wing values. BBC dramas and even children's programmes have been made politically-correct so they can brainwash people with leftist values.

The storming of the Capitol was instigated by Trump because he was a bad loser beta and couldn't stand someone else winning the election, that's all. As bad as it was, it wasn't directly associated with right-wing politics, that wasn't his main motive. The BLM riots on the other hand were directly motivated by left-wing politics.

The statues are not meant to worship people, they're just there to commemorate them for the good things they did for the world, and to defile them like those dumbass BLM protesters do is desecrating a living human being's memory, second only to doing that to their graves. That is unforgivable.

We're already forced to follow people whether you like it or not, we're still supposed to respect our country's leaders and people have become reliant upon greedy, self-serving businessmen like Gates, Bezos and Musk to have all their luxuries.

It may hurt us in the UK right now but when we start trading with our other allies in Canada, Australia, New Zealand and the like, we'll be able to rise to our feet again. We can live without interference from mainland Europe.

With all due respect, Germany is getting the most out of the EU at the expense of Italy, Spain and Greece, so it's pretty easy for its people to glorify it. What the EU have done to criticise and damage British companies after Brexit just because we decided to leave is pretty much revealing it as little more than a gangster group that intends to get us to fail as a warning to the other countries in it. Also the way it has tried to demean and belittle our politicians was awful.

Maybe our difference in opinion is just because we live in different countries with different political parties. Here in Britain we don't hear anything from the far right except the odd National Action criminal being arrested, which is all well and good, that's true, but we hear a lot more from the leftist anarchists causing riot after riot after riot.

Well, actively discriminating against these people, and whites in general, by giving other races special treatment isn't the way to solve the problem, that's just petty 'tit for tat'.

I personally run by just a single rule - everyone is equal and must be treated as such, regardless of creed, race, gender or disability - why couldn't the government just instill that law and apply it to everything?

Historians can be biased because of their background and their own agendas. The British Empire did do pretty good stuff in places. Once Britain abolished slavery, the Empire became an anti-slavery organisation, hunting down slave ships of other countries, giving the slaves new lives in their colonies and drafting them into the army to give them a wage to feed their families (the Empire also did this with slaves rescued from the American South during the American Civil War). With regards to the African campaign, the Empire did stop all inter-tribal warfare in the territories it colonised, and it's only resumed now that the Empire has gone and given countries independence. The Empire also protected the countries in its charge, like wiping out the Thuggi Cult in India, which was truly evil and slaughtered whole caravans of unarmed Indian traders by garroting. I'm not saying everything it did was good by any means, it still but it didn't do those bad things for fun as Hitler seemed to do with his atrocities. Many good men, both British and allied, died to establish its power, all to give Britain its best chance of survival. The colonies then repaid us for protecting them by doing all they could in the World Wars, and continue to have a healthy relationship with us today in the Commonwealth.

The atrocities in China are very real, and being neutral to that, as the left wing wants us to do, is only going to help China carry on committing them. Just like Switzerland being neutral in both World Wars helped the aggressors, not the oppressed.

 

First off, we might want to define the term a "few". As a percentage, maybe, but as an absolute value it was far from what I would define as a few.

I'll keep this extremely short as these discussions are typically quite pointless.

BLM riots versus January 6th incident:

• Fact: BLM riots were responsible for more death
• Fact: BLM riots were responsible for more assault/injury
• Fact: BLM riots were responsible for more property damage
• Fact: BLM riots had a greater negative impact on businesses

Don't get me wrong, both were terrible incidents, but they are not comparable in terms of scope or damage.

 

Just a joke (couldn't help it). Yes, I recognize that they are not the same thing!