Razordon
Seraphandy
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 353
- Likes Received
- 848
- Trophy Points
- 93
I know is this is a contentious subject, but:
Having got back into GW late 2016 after a 20+ odd year break I was gutted to find AoS had replaced WFB.
In the 80s, I loved the environment that WFB existed in (and later 40k). It was deeply tragic but with splashes of humour and full of character and depth. It was something that I wanted to be part of.
On my return, AoS felt hollow and something that I could not (for fantasy) associate with. Regardless, I picked my army (guess what - Seraphon/lizardmen
) and gave it a shot, but focusing on the building and painting and put the backstory to one side.
However, a year and a bit in I feel things are changing. The backstory is more grounded and a story is begining to unfold. It's not as conceptual, almost quasi religious, but about the soldiers and minor characters that I can associate with; almost like WFB.
Malign Portents is a good example.
So what?
I think the background to AOS could get as interesting at WFB. I'm not talking rules, just the fantasy realm.
What do you think?
Having got back into GW late 2016 after a 20+ odd year break I was gutted to find AoS had replaced WFB.
In the 80s, I loved the environment that WFB existed in (and later 40k). It was deeply tragic but with splashes of humour and full of character and depth. It was something that I wanted to be part of.
On my return, AoS felt hollow and something that I could not (for fantasy) associate with. Regardless, I picked my army (guess what - Seraphon/lizardmen
However, a year and a bit in I feel things are changing. The backstory is more grounded and a story is begining to unfold. It's not as conceptual, almost quasi religious, but about the soldiers and minor characters that I can associate with; almost like WFB.
Malign Portents is a good example.
So what?
I think the background to AOS could get as interesting at WFB. I'm not talking rules, just the fantasy realm.
What do you think?


