• The forum software have been upgraded to the latest version.

    If you notice anything that looks off, or does not work, please let us know.

    For more information, click here.

The Shrine to Lost Armies

There were many possibilities but what I’m saying is that it’s a shame that GW never acted upon these ideas.

True, GW always followed the "tolkien" concepts of tons of heavily armored dwarfs marching on foot. Then adding cannons and gyrocopters. Some ram cavalry would have been pretty neat; those badger riders are pretty cool!
 
True, GW always followed the "tolkien" concepts of tons of heavily armored dwarfs marching on foot. Then adding cannons and gyrocopters. Some ram cavalry would have been pretty neat; those badger riders are pretty cool!

Or some Dwarf Monstrous Cavalry perhaps?

3bba1441c0a2dcee31e85d8e5202efe1.jpg
 
I always liked GW's take on this.

It does make for a very thematic take on the Dwarfs but it is also a pain in the backside for Dwarf players like myself. You can imagine our celebrations when Storm of Magic allowed Dwarfs to take monsters as allies!

True, it does make them very tough to play, as it feels like an uphill battle. Hurrah for the grumbling underdogs!
 
In a sense, but against Dwarfs you have to remember that the opposition can't really take monsters either because they blasted off the field.

True - especially with the ability to take 3 cannons and the improved Organ Gun that only misfires on a double misfire! :p
 
I've started a blog to detail a dwarf project. Inperial dwarves, to be exact
 
True - especially with the ability to take 3 cannons and the improved Organ Gun that only misfires on a double misfire! :p
Precisely. Besides, overall monsters weren't that effective in 8th edition (with a few exceptions). Too many armies could field cannons... and cannons were simply a hard counter to monsters.
 
Back
Top