• The forum software have been upgraded to the latest version.

    If you notice anything that looks off, or does not work, please let us know.

    For more information, click here.

AoS NEW *rumor*

BwV needs an errata. It rules don't work in conjunction with garrison rules. BwV + caster that summoned it count as one model as long as they are on the battlefield, but going into a garrison removes the caster model from the battlefield. Current rules give no indication what happens with the BwV model in this case, just that caster + BwV model don't count as a single model anymore. The common sense approach means it does not work.
There is an errata for BwV in the Skaven list on the community site. It clarifies that the BwV follows a model when the model isn't removed from having been slain. GW has said that is applies across the board and not just to the skaven.
 
@LizardWizard Skaven Designer's Commentary talks about BwV in combination with a "Skitterleap" ability. No idea what that does, and no mention of that interaction being some kind of default. No mention of BwV in the Skaven errata. Did you mean something else?
 
@LizardWizard Skaven Designer's Commentary talks about BwV in combination with a "Skitterleap" ability. No idea what that does, and no mention of that interaction being some kind of default. No mention of BwV in the Skaven errata. Did you mean something else?
skiter leap is a teleport you remove both the wizard and the BW and move it. later GW confirmed that it aplise to all model removal
 
@LizardWizard Skaven Designer's Commentary talks about BwV in combination with a "Skitterleap" ability. No idea what that does, and no mention of that interaction being some kind of default. No mention of BwV in the Skaven errata. Did you mean something else?
Nope that is the one. GW has said that BwV moves with the caster and that it doesn't only apply to Skitterleap. I will try to find the follow up post where it was clarified.
 
I can't see anything regarding objective control here. Maybe I'm blind or something :D
Page 11, Gaming Book. Terrain.
upload_2020-3-4_17-13-20.png
 
I can't see anything regarding objective control here. Maybe I'm blind or something :D
Page 13, Gaming Book. Terrain.
View attachment 67233
There is currently nothing that would stop a garrisoned unit from controlling an objectives. However, If GW lets us place our terrain within 3" of objectives, like other factions, then we might should expect an errat specific to the Realmshaper Engine if it doesn't already have a rule on its warscroll. That being said. I hope it can be placed within 3" and that they don't make any errata regarding the garrisoned units holding objectives.
 
Back
Top